Utter Threat Charges:

Question: What is the maximum penalty for an uttering threats charge in Ontario, and what defences could a criminal defence team use to challenge whether a real threat was actually conveyed?

Answer:   MuskokaCriminal.Law™ can help people in Ontario who are facing an uttering threats allegation by explaining how the charge under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 generally depends on what type of threat was alleged and how it was made, and by reviewing the wording, context, and who heard it to assess whether the prosecution can prove the elements beyond a reasonable doubt (with the offence potentially prosecuted as an indictable matter with up to five years’ imprisonment or as a summary conviction matter with up to two years less a day, depending on the conduct described under Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46)  Defence strategies may include challenging whether the communication was actually a “threat” rather than other words, disputing the intended meaning or knowledge, and correcting issues like an incorrect person being accused or problems with the way evidence was obtained or interpreted  If you or someone you care about has been charged, call (519) 223-3329 for prompt guidance from a criminal defence team in Ontario.

Understanding the Criminal Charge of Uttering Threats Including Potential Penalties and Available Defence Strategies

The criminal offence of uttering threats is known as a hybrid offence meaning that the prosecution of an uttering threats charge may proceed as an indictable offence and therefore as a very serious matter that may result in imprisonment for a maximum of five (5) years depending upon how the threat was made, who or what the threat was directed towards, and the consequences that occurred, if any, as a result of the uttered threat.  Alternatively, an uttering threats charge may proceed as a summary conviction offence where the maximum imprisonment is two (2) years less a day.  Where a charge of uttering threats is brought, the context of the alleged threat and therefore whether any genuine threat was truly uttered requires careful review.  There are various defence strategies that may be available and applicable when defending an uttering threats charge.

The Law

The conduct that may give rise to an uttering threats charge is prescribed at section 264.1(1) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, wherein it is said:

Interestingly, a person may be charged with uttering threats without even uttering the threat directly towards the targeted person.  A threat uttered about a targeted person that is heard by a person other than the targeted person is enough to result in an uttering threats charge.  In fact, the targeted person towards whom the threat was uttered may be without any knowledge whatsoever that a threat was even made.

Potential Penalties

The potential penalties upon conviction on a charge of uttering threats are quite serious.  The potential penalties are dependant upon the nature of the specific threat and are prescribed within section 264.1(2) of the Criminal Code where it is said:

Available Defence Strategies

The definition of what actually constitutes as an uttered threat requires careful analysis.  Diligent legal counsel will review the, allegedly, threatening words and provide appropriate defence strategy advice to the accused person.  The specific defence strategies that will be available, meaning logically applicable, to the defence of an uttering threats charge will depend upon the specific utterances involved.

Conclusion

The charge of uttering threats may involve a penalty of up to five (5) years in jail if prosecuted as an indictable offence or up to two (2) years less a day in jail if prosecuted as a summary conviction offence.  Other potential consequences may also arise.  A strong defence strategy to aggressively defend an uttering threats charge is well warranted.